Skip to content

Cache activity before opening retirement PRs#120

Open
philiptaron wants to merge 1 commit into
NixOS:mainfrom
philiptaron:issue-100
Open

Cache activity before opening retirement PRs#120
philiptaron wants to merge 1 commit into
NixOS:mainfrom
philiptaron:issue-100

Conversation

@philiptaron

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I hate those "whoops" issues that #100 creates. Here's one kind of dumb take on fixing it. Sorry for the bash overload. I didn't want to rewrite this in github script first.

What does it do? In short, we persist the latest observed merge activity and the first inactive observation between workflow runs using a GitHub workflow artifact. A missing /commits response now starts a confirmation window instead of immediately opening a retirement PR. The result is that cached positive activity can keep active committers from being retired when GitHub returns an empty result spuriously.


I don't really love the resulting code. I'd sort of like to rewrite the whole thing.


Fixes #100

Persist the latest observed merge activity and the first inactive observation between workflow runs. A missing /commits response now starts a confirmation window instead of immediately opening a retirement PR, while cached positive activity can keep active committers from being retired when GitHub returns an empty result spuriously.
@philiptaron philiptaron requested a review from mweinelt July 8, 2026 22:11
@philiptaron philiptaron requested a review from infinisil as a code owner July 8, 2026 22:11

@MattSturgeon MattSturgeon left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

I won't pretend to have fully digested the bash impl, so don't be offended if I spot something worth commenting on later.

SGTM overall, though. Nice idea to mitigate GitHub's flakiness!

Comment on lines +65 to +68
name: retire-cache
path: .cache/retire-cache.csv
if-no-files-found: error
overwrite: true

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: could we do archive: false so the CSV becomes readable in a browser? There should be no need to zip archive it.

This also means we don't need name, as it's ignored when not archiving, path's basename is used instead.


Let's also explicitly set retention-days. The default (and maximum) is 90, but if we schedule this workflow daily we can probably reduce artifact retention to a week or two?

Comment on lines +46 to +55
- name: Restore activity cache
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: |
runId=$(gh run list --workflow=retire.yml --status=success --limit 1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId // empty')
if [[ -n "$runId" ]] && gh run download "$runId" --name retire-cache --dir .cache; then
echo "Restored activity cache from run $runId"
else
echo "No previous activity cache, starting fresh"
fi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is trivial enough as bash, but if written as a github-script action, we'd gain more explicit handling of error modes (e.g. the API request failing).

Having this small step be github-script could be a small win and set a precedent for later rewriting other scripts too?

Fine as is, though.

env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: |
runId=$(gh run list --workflow=retire.yml --status=success --limit 1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId // empty')

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would benefit from pipefail (etc), which we can enable throughout by setting shell: bash explicitly somewhere:

https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/workflow-syntax#defaultsrunshell

(Ideally, set the default at the top of the workflow, otherwise set shell: on relevant steps)

Comment thread scripts/retire.sh
Comment on lines +98 to +100
# Matches the merge lines produced by the jq filter below,
# capturing the merge date and PR number for the cache
mergeLineRegex='^- `([^`]+)` .*(#[0-9]+)$'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels a little brittle. Is there a way we can pass the date+number values around in a way that doesn't require string parsing to extract them again?

@philiptaron

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Every one of your comments makes me want to rewrite it in github-script, @MattSturgeon :-)

Thanks for taking a look. I'll cogitate on these comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unreliable /commits endpoint

2 participants